Keeping the spark: Pursuing FIRE and staying aligned on money

Posted By |
Image courtesy Tawcan/unsplash

By Bob Lai, Tawcan

Special to Financial Independence Hub

On paper, Financial Independence Retire Early (FIRE) is a simple concept: spend less than you earn, grow your savings gap, optimize your taxes, invest your savings, and wait for your money to compound over time.

But one thing that doesn’t get covered enough with the FIRE movement is the relationship side of money.

To be more specific, if you’re on the FIRE journey with a partner, how do you make sure the two of you are aligned? After all, if you and your partner aren’t on the same page, none of it matters.

For us, Mrs. T and I have been on the FI journey since 2011. This year marks the 15th year of our journey. That’s 15 years of saving, budgeting, investing, making difficult financial decisions, and occasionally having disagreements on money-related decisions.

I figure it’s worthwhile to spend some time discussing how we stay aligned on money and some of the relationship challenges we have faced since we started our FI journey.

How it all started: The financial epiphany

Although both of us came from frugal backgrounds and we both learned in our youth to spend less than we earn, we didn’t really focus on optimizing our finances or investing intentionally when we started dating and when we started living together.

It wasn’t until we read the Secret of Millionaire Mindset that we started having deeper and more detailed conversations about money and how we want our financial future to be. Around the same time, we were also considering getting married, so it was important to make sure we were both aligned on our future financial plans. We both recognized that building wealth through saving and investing could give us more options and freedom in the future.

But just because we talked about money didn’t mean we always agreed on every financial decision we made.

Far from that!

How we are different due to our money personalities 

Mrs. T and I don’t think about money the same way.

Deep down, I’m an “extreme” saver and optimizer. I’d always find ways to optimize things and try to save as much money as possible. Even if I could save 50% on something, I would try to find more ways to save another 20%.

Mrs. T, on the other hand, is a more balanced saver. She doesn’t like spending money unnecessarily, but typically won’t climb the mountain to see if she could save even more.

Another way we are different is that I’m a self-proclaimed spreadsheet nerd. I am a numbers person and I love spreadsheets. I have many different spreadsheets tracking different things and data, charting our historical trends and projecting future ones. Whenever I see data in spreadsheets, I see data and optimization opportunities.

Mrs. T likes spreadsheets too but not nearly to the extent that I do.. She’s more practical and intuitive. She cares whether we have enough and whether we can enjoy life now without sacrificing our future. She likes to see things from the 30,000-foot view rather than getting into the nitty-gritty details, as I do.

Our different money personalities created some disagreements and discontent when we first started our FI journey. For example, Mrs. T enjoyed going to a cafe to have great conversations while having a good cup of coffee and delicious pastries (i.e. having hygge). Meanwhile, I would calculate in my mind how much money we could have saved and invested if we hadn’t spent the money.

Realizing what we needed to keep us aligned 

Over time, I realized my save-save-save-then-save-more default mentality wasn’t healthy. I learned that I need to relax and spend money to enjoy the present moment. On the flip side, Mrs. T began to understand my worries and my insecurity with not having enough money and started to cut back slightly on the “nice to have” expenses.

We found our “balance” by meeting each other in the middle. We both learned that it’s vital for us to stay aligned financially. These are some systems and habits that have helped us:

Regular money conversations 

We talk about money regularly but we try to keep it natural and relaxed rather than turning these chats into formal meetings. We’ll talk about money over meals, over coffee hygge, or while driving. Quite often, we involve both kids and explain to them why we are talking about these topics. In our household, we don’t shy away from money talks, we encourage them.

These money conversations happen regularly, sometimes multiple times a day. We keep them very casual and relaxed. Although we have regular money conversations, we don’t discuss our investment portfolio and net worth daily. We want to ignore the noise and focus on the long term. I’m in charge of the details and I provide Mrs. T the big picture updates without overwhelming her with all the details. So when it comes to investment portfolio and net worth, we typically discuss them in detail every quarter.

Reviewing our expenses: focusing on the trends rather than amount spent

When we first started tracking our expenses and using our budget system, I was very much focused on how much we spent on the different categories every month. I wasn’t looking at the big picture and certainly wasn’t focusing on the spending trend.

As our net worth grew larger and we had a few years of spending data on our hands, we finally developed a system that works for us. Every 6 months, Mrs. T and I will sit down for about 10 to 15 minutes to look at our spending spreadsheet. We look at the trends and see if there are categories we are overspending or underspending. If we are overspending in a certain category, we try to find out why. For example, if we were spending more than usual on dining out, perhaps it was because we had friends or family visiting.

Making the financial big decisions together 

For the most part, I manage our investment portfolio and make the buying and selling decisions. Sometimes I would consult with Mrs. T if I were to make drastic decisions like adding a new position or closing a position. Mrs. T trusts my judgment on the day-to-day investment decisions, but I found it is always a good idea to talk to her about my investment thesis and get an agreement on big portfolio moves.< Continue Reading…

What does Generation Squeeze have against couples with OAS?

Posted By |

By Michael J. Wiener, 

Special to Financial Independence Hub

 

An organization called Generation Squeeze is calling for big cuts to Old Age Security (OAS).  For some reason, these cuts are aimed exclusively at senior couples.  Digging into the numbers, the proposal makes no sense.

The stated goal of the proposed OAS changes is to free up government money for other priorities.  Whether or not OAS is the right target for reducing government spending is a different discussion.  The puzzling part of this proposal is having all the cuts apply to senior couples.

Currently, OAS will get clawed back from any senior whose 2025 net income (Line 23400 of the tax return) is over $93,454.  For each dollar over this income threshold, OAS payments are reduced by 15 cents.  The current rules make no distinction between singles and couples.  The calculation is based on each person’s own income without regard to whether they have a spouse.

It’s more expensive for two people to live than just one

Generation Squeeze wants to change the threshold to $100,000 for total household income.  So, single seniors would lose nothing, and senior couples would eat all of the cuts.  The problem here is that it is more expensive for two people to live than just one.  The figure actuaries use is that it costs about 40% more for two people in the same home to live than it costs for one person. Continue Reading…

The Cross-Border Retirement Traps Canadians don’t see coming

Posted By |

You did everything right for retirement in Canada. Then you started spending winters down south, and a different rulebook quietly took over.

Royalty-free image courtesy TheNorthernOffice.ca

By Alex Setzler

Special to Financal Independence Hub

Ask a Canadian snowbird how many days they can spend in the U.S. before things get complicated, and most give the same answer: 182. Stay under half the year and you’re fine. That number is comforting. It’s also the wrong number, and trusting it is how careful savers walk into problems they never saw coming.

Over the past year I’ve talked with a lot of Canadians who split their time across the border, and the same five traps catch them again and again. Here they are:

1.) The day count is weighted, and it bites earlier than 182

The 182-day rule people repeat is a Canadian idea, tied to provincial health coverage and Canadian residency. The IRS doesn’t use it. The U.S. uses the Substantial Presence Test, and it counts three years at once: all of your days this year, plus a third of last year’s days, plus a sixth of the days from the year before. Cross 183 weighted days and the IRS can treat you as a US tax resident, taxable on your worldwide income.

Run the math and it’s sneakier than people expect. Spend about 120 days a year in the U.S. every year, and you land right on the edge. Four months each winter (roughly 122 days) puts you over. Not half the year. A third of it.

There’s a release valve. If you stay under 183 actual days in the current year, you can usually file Form 8840, the Closer Connection Exception, and tell the IRS your real home is Canada. It isn’t automatic. You file it every year, by June 15.

Miss the deadline, or spend one day past 182, and the exception is gone.
The number that protects you was never 182. It’s the paperwork.

2.) Your TFSA, the account Canadians love most, is the one the IRS likes least

The TFSA is close to a national treasure. Tax-free growth, tax-free withdrawals, no catch. In Canada.
Cross the border and the catch shows up. The U.S. doesn’t recognize the TFSA as tax-free. The treaty protection that shelters your RRSP doesn’t extend to it. So the income growing “tax-free” inside your TFSA can be fully taxable to the U.S., and the account itself may be treated as a foreign trust, which drags in extra reporting forms whose penalties start in the five figures.

The reporting piece is genuinely unsettled. Cross-border tax pros still argue about exactly which forms a TFSA triggers, and the IRS hasn’t given a clean answer. When the experts aren’t sure, “assume it’s fine” is not the safe move.

3.) The RESP carries the same surprise, right when you need the money

If you opened a Registered Education Savings Plan (RESP)( for your kids, same story. The U.S. doesn’t see it as the tax-sheltered education account it is in Canada. The growth, and in some cases the government grant money, can become a US tax and reporting question at the worst possible time: when your kid starts school and you’re pulling the money out.

4.) FBAR: the form that has nothing to do with tax, and still bites

This one catches people because it isn’t about how much tax you owe. f you’re a U.S. tax resident and your Canadian accounts added together ever cross $10,000 USD at any single moment in the year, you have to report them to the U.S. Treasury on an FBAR. Chequing, savings, RRSP, TFSA, the business account, all of it, combined.

Ten thousand dollars isn’t a wealthy-person number. One paycheque or a moved-over down payment clears it. And the penalties for skipping it were built for people hiding money offshore, which means they’re harsh, and they don’t care that you simply didn’t know. The form is easy. Not knowing it exists is the expensive part.

5.) The good-news trap: your RRSP is fine, so people guard the wrong account

Here’s the flip. After all that, the account most people worry about, the RRSP, is the one the treaty actually protects.
Under the Canada-US tax treaty you can defer U.S. tax on the growth inside your RRSP until you take the money out, same as you do in Canada. The old extra form for it got scrapped years ago. Continue Reading…

Safer investments for retirees: How to retire with less stress

Posted By |

Overall we see safer investments for retirees as ones that focus on a long-term conservative strategy and make calculated use of RRSPs and RRIFs to boost returns

TSInetwork.ca

Retirement planning is becoming more challenging for Canadians because they’re living longer and need larger retirement nest eggs.

This often manifests itself in “pre-retirement financial stress syndrome.”

That’s the malady that strikes when it dawns on you that you may not have enough money saved to be able to earn the retirement income stream you were banking on.

 

To alleviate this worry, we recommend Successful Investors base their retirement planning on a sound financial plan. Here are the four key variables that your plan should address to ensure you have sufficient retirement income:

  1. How much you expect to save prior to retirement;
  2. The return you expect on your savings;
  3. How much of that return you’ll have left after taxes;
  4. How much retirement income you’ll need once you’ve left the workforce.

Note, though, that if you’re heading into retirement and are short of money, you should move your investing in the direction of safer, more conservative investments. That’s a far better option than taking one last gamble.

Moving into “too safe” investments for retirees can sharply cut your long-term returns

This applies as well to “risk-reducing strategies,” of which there are many. One of the most common is the urge to “go into cash” (also known as “taking money off the table”) when you foresee a market downturn. Like all risk-reducing strategies, this one can seemingly work from time to time, by getting you out of the market before a drop. But it’s even more effective at ensuring that you are out of the market when prices are shooting upward.

In the stock market, downturns do come along from time to time. But they are far less common than fears of downturns, which are virtually non-stop.

Editor’s Note: Last chance to register for today’s free AI investing webinar, hosted by The Successful Investor and Findependence Hub. The webinar begins today at 11:30 a.m. EDT and will cover practical ways to approach investing in A.I. stocks while keeping risk in mind. We shared the full details in our Canada Day blog post last week, with a reminder on July 4. If you would like to attend, you can still register here.

Pat McKeough has been one of Canada’s most respected investment advisors for over three decades. He is the founder and senior editor of TSI Network and the founder of Successful Investor Wealth Management. He is also the author of several acclaimed investment books. This article was published on June 4, 2026 and is republished on Findependence Hub with permission.

Matching your investment portfolios to your Retirement Cash Flow plan

Posted By |


By Dale Roberts, Retirement Club/cutthecrapinvesting

Special to Financial Independence Hub

It appears to be an overlooked part of retirement planning. While we should always invest within our risk tolerance level we should also match our investment portfolios to the retirement cash flow plan. The plan gives the marching orders for each account. If you create a portfolio-to-plan mismatch, you could increase the risk of depleting an account too soon. On the other side if you are too conservative where an account has the time horizon to run, you create opportunity cost. You missed the opportunity to create significantly more wealth over time.

As always the following is not advice.

We can look to the Canadian asset allocation ETFs for a lesson on risk and asset allocation. In that post that tracks the performance of the asset allocation ETF providers, you’ll find this key table.

Source: Dale/ETF providers. Keep in mind there is no guarantee of returns for any period

We can see that when our time horizon is short we create conservative portfolios with lots of bonds and cash. When we have a longer time horizon of 10 years and more, we can be more aggressive perhaps even holding an all-equity portfolio. But once again, risk tolerance permitting.

I recently discussed risk and common mistakes on the BMO ETF Insights YouTube channel.

In the accumulation stage we might pay attention to this chart if you are saving for a home and plan to buy within the next two years. If would be very risk to hold those home down payment funds in an all equity (XEQT-T) portfolio. Your $100,000 could quickly be turned into $50,000 in a severe bear market.

Sequence of returns risk in retirement

Risk gets flipped in retirement. In the accumulation stage if you have 20 years to go before retirement and we enter a severe bear market, “great”. You can now buy your companies/equities at fire-sale prices. Over time that can generate a boost to your wealth creation. You own more of those great companies. Continue Reading…